Mostly looks good. I wonder if there are any security concerns with the 'secret' being public. If so, perhaps randomly generate it at launch?

This has the commits from #208 which haven't yet been merged into master.

Please merge #208 first and remove these commits so only 330d383 and 0f13070 are in this PR.

@gemmaleigh sorry, all sorted now

👍

Is there an example of how to use this in the docs?

@gemmaleigh no, but our current docs are not in great shape, not sure about adding to them in their current form - do you think it's worth it?

Is this work just setup for #205?

it's helpful for that, but it's not just for that. I've had people ask how to add session support, and it's a clear need if you're wanting to keep data through a multi-page process. It might be a while before we get something like #205 as it's a big piece of work that needs to be done right.

My point about the docs is we have a total rewrite over here: #158 and I'm not sure where docs on this would sit in current structure

Is anything blocking #158 now? @edwardhorsford ?

I've now added documentation, is this good to go now?

👍 Thanks for adding the docs.